Why Is It Risky to Invest in Commodities?
Why is it risky to invest in a commodity — and why is it a good idea? In this article, we’ll give you a crash course on commodity risk and trading.
Read moreWhy is it risky to invest in a commodity — and why is it a good idea? In this article, we’ll give you a crash course on commodity risk and trading.
Read moreTable of Contents
Asset allocation is an investment strategy that helps you decide the ratio of different asset classes in your portfolio to ensure that your investments align with your risk tolerance, time horizon, and goals.
In other words, the way you allocate, or divide up the assets in your portfolio, helps to balance risk, while aiming for the highest potential return within the time period you have to achieve your investment goals. Here’s what you need to know about asset-based asset allocation.
Key Points
• Asset allocation is the process of dividing investments among different asset classes based on factors like age, risk tolerance, and financial goals.
• Younger investors can typically afford to take more risks and allocate a higher percentage of their portfolio to stocks.
• As investors approach retirement, they may shift towards a more conservative asset allocation, with a higher percentage allocated to bonds and cash.
• Regularly reviewing and rebalancing your asset allocation is important to ensure it aligns with your changing financial circumstances and goals.
• Asset allocation is a personal decision and should be based on individual factors such as risk tolerance, time horizon, and investment objectives.
The mix of assets you hold will likely shift with age. When you’re younger and have a longer time horizon, you might want to hold more stocks, which offer the most growth potential. Also, that longer time horizon gives you plenty of years to help ride out volatility in the market.
You will likely want to shift your asset allocation as you get older, though. As retirement age approaches, and the point at which you’ll need to tap your savings draws near, you may want to shift your retirement asset allocation into less risky assets like bonds and cash equivalents to help protect your money from downturns.
In the past, investment advisors recommended a rule of thumb whereby an investor would subtract their age from 100 to know how much of their portfolio to hold in stocks. What is an asset allocation that follows that rule? A 30-year-old might allocate 70% of their portfolio to stocks, while a 60-year-old would allocate 40%.
However, as life expectancy continues to increase — especially for women — and people rely on their retirement savings to cover the cost of longer lifespans (and potential healthcare expenses), some industry experts and advisors now recommend that investors keep a more aggressive asset allocation for a longer period.
The new thinking has shifted the formula to subtracting your age from 110 or 120 to maintain a more aggressive allocation to stocks.
In that case, a 30-year-old might allocate 80% of their portfolio to stocks (110 – 30 = 80), and a 60-year-old might have a portfolio allocation that’s 50% stocks (110 – 60 = 50) — which is a bit more aggressive than the previous 40% allocation.
These are not hard-and-fast rules, but general guidelines for thinking about your own asset allocation strategy. Each person’s financial situation is different, so each portfolio allocation will vary.
💡 Quick Tip: All investments come with some degree of risk — and some are riskier than others. Before investing online, decide on your investment goals and how much risk you want to take.
As stated, age is a very important consideration when it comes to strategic asset allocation. Here are some asset allocation examples for different age groups.
For younger investors, the conventional wisdom suggests they may want to hold most of their portfolio in stocks to help save for long-term financial goals like retirement.
That said, when you’re young, your financial footing may not be very secure. You probably haven’t built much of a nest egg, you may change jobs relatively frequently, and you may have debt, such as student loans, to worry about. Setting up a potentially volatile, stock-focused allocation might feel nerve-wracking.
If you have a 401(k) at work, this might be your primary investment vehicle — or you may have set up an IRA. In either account you can invest in mutual funds or exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that hold a mix of stocks, providing some low-cost diversification without sacrificing the potential for long-term growth.
You could also invest in a target date fund, which is designed to help to manage your asset allocation over time (more on these funds below).
When choosing funds, it’s important to consider both potential performance and fees. Index funds, which simply mirror the performance of a certain market index, may carry lower expense ratios but they may generate lower returns compared to, say, a growth fund that’s more expensive.
Remember that the younger you are, the longer you have to recover from market downturns or losses. So allocating a bigger chunk of your investments to growth funds or funds that use an active management strategy could make sense if you feel their fees are justified by the potential for higher returns — and the higher risk that comes along with it.
And of course, you can counterbalance higher-risk/higher-reward investments with bonds or bond funds (as a cushion against volatility), index funds (to help manage costs) or target date funds (which can do a bit of both). Just be aware that the holdings within some funds can overlap, which could hamper your diversification strategy and require you to choose investment carefully.
As you enter middle age you are potentially entering your peak earning years. You may also have more financial obligations, such as mortgage payments, and bigger savings goals, such as sending your kids to college, than you did when you were younger. On the upside, you may also have 20 years or more before you’re thinking about retiring.
In the early part of these decades, one approach is to consider keeping a hefty portion of your portfolio still allocated to stocks. This may be useful if you haven’t yet been able to save much for your retirement because you’d be able to add potential growth to your portfolio, and still have some years to ride out any volatility.
Depending on when you plan to retire, adding stability to your portfolio with bonds as you approach the latter part of these decades might be a wise choice. For example, you may want to begin by shifting more of your IRA assets to bonds or bond funds at this stage. These investments may produce lower returns in the short term compared to mutual funds or ETFs. But they can be useful for generating income once you’re ready to begin making withdrawals from your accounts in retirement.
Once you hit your 60s and you’re nearing retirement age, your allocation will likely shift toward fixed-income assets like bonds, and maybe even cash. A shift like this can help prepare you for the possibility that markets may be down when you retire.
If that’s the case, you might be able to use these fixed-income investments to provide income during the downturn, so you can avoid selling stocks while the markets are down since doing so would lock in losses and might curtail future growth in your portfolio. Thus, leaning on the fixed-income portion of your portfolio allows time for the market to recover before you need to tap into stocks.
If you haven’t retired yet, you can continue making contributions to your 401(k) to grow your nest egg and take advantage of any employer match.
If you chose to invest in a target date fund within your retirement account when you were younger, it’s likely that fund’s allocation would now be tilting toward fixed-income assets as well.
Once you’ve retired it may seem like you can kick back and relax with all of your asset allocation worries behind you. Yet, your portfolio allocation is as important to consider now as it was in your 20s.
When you retire, you’ll likely be on a fixed income — and you won’t be adding to your savings with earned wages. Your retirement could last 20 to 30 years or more, so consider holding a mix of assets that includes stocks that might provide some growth. Keeping a modest stock allocation might help you avoid outliving your savings and preserve your spending power.
While that may sound contrary to the suggestion above for pre-retirees to keep more of their assets allocated to fixed-income, the difference is the level of protection you might want just prior to retirement. Now as an official retiree, and thinking about the potential decades ahead, you may want to inject a little growth potential into your portfolio.
It might also make sense to hold assets that grow faster than the rate of inflation or are inflation-protected, such as Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities, or TIPS, which can help your nest egg hold its value.
These are highly personal decisions that, again, go back to the three intersecting factors that drive asset allocation: your goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon. There’s no right answer; the task is arriving at the right answer for you.
At its heart, a financial asset is anything of value that you own, whether that’s a piece of property or a single stock. When you invest, you’re typically looking to buy an asset that will increase in value.
The three broad groups, or asset classes, that are generally held in investment accounts are stocks, bonds, and cash. When you invest, you will likely hold different proportions of these asset classes.
What are some asset allocation examples? Well, your portfolio might hold 60% stocks, 40% bonds, and no cash — or 70% stocks, 20% bonds, and 10% in cash or cash equivalents. But how you decide that ratio gets into the nuts and bolts of your actual asset allocation strategy, because each of these asset types behaves differently over time and has a different level of risk and return associated with it.
• Stocks. Stocks typically offer the highest rates of return. However, with the potential for greater reward comes higher risk. Typically, stocks are the most volatile of these three categories, especially in the short term. But over the long term, the return on equities (aka stocks) has generally been positive. In fact, the S&P 500 index, a proxy for the U.S. stock market, has historically returned an average of 10% annually (approximately 7% when adjusted for inflation).
• Bonds. Bonds are traditionally less risky than stocks and offer steadier returns. A general rule of thumb is that bond prices move in the opposite direction of stocks.
When you buy a bond, you are essentially loaning money to a company or a government. You receive regular interest on the money you loan, and the principal you paid for the bond is returned to you when the bond’s term is up. When buying bonds, investors generally accept smaller returns in exchange for the security they offer.
• Cash. Cash, or cash equivalents, such as certificates of deposit (CDs) or money market accounts, are the least volatile investments. But they typically offer relatively low returns.
💡 Quick Tip: Are self-directed brokerage accounts cost efficient? They can be, because they offer the convenience of being able to buy stocks online without using a traditional full-service broker (and the typical broker fees).
The old adage, “Don’t put all your eggs in one basket,” is apt for a number of concepts in investing.
Putting all of your money in one investment may expose you to too much risk. When it comes to asset allocation, you can help manage risk by spreading money out over different asset classes that are then weighted differently within a portfolio.
Here is a possible asset allocation example: If your stock allocation was 100%, and the stock market hit a speed bump, your entire portfolio could lose value. But if your allocation were divided among stocks, bonds, and cash, a drop in the value of your stock allocation wouldn’t have the same impact. It would be mitigated to a degree, because the bonds and cash allocation of your portfolio likely wouldn’t suffer similar losses (remember: bond prices generally move in the opposite direction of stocks, and cash/cash equivalents rarely react to market turmoil).
Portfolio diversification is a separate, yet related, concept. Simple diversification can be achieved with the broader asset classes of stocks, bonds, and cash. But within each asset class you could also consider holding many different assets for additional diversification and risk protection.
For example, allocating the stock portion of your portfolio to a single stock may not be a great idea, as noted above. Instead, you might invest in a basket of stocks. If you hold a single stock and it drops, your whole stock portfolio falls with it. But if you hold 25 different stocks — when one stock falls, the effect on your overall portfolio is relatively small.
On an even deeper level, you may want to diversify across many types of stock — for example, varying by company size, geography, or sector. One way some investors choose to diversify is by holding mutual funds, index funds, or ETFs that themselves hold a diverse basket of stocks.
What is rebalancing? As assets gain and lose value, the proportion of your portfolio they represent also changes. For example, say you have a portfolio allocation that includes 60% stocks and the stock market ticks upward. The stocks you hold might have appreciated and now represent 70% or even 80% of your overall portfolio.
In order to realign your portfolio to your desired 60% allocation, you might rebalance it by selling some stocks and buying bonds. Why sell securities that are gaining value? Again, it’s with an eye toward managing the potential risk of future losses.
If your equity allocation was 60%, but has grown to 70% or 80% in a bull market, you’re exposed to more volatility. Rebalancing back to 60% helps to mitigate that risk.
The idea of rebalancing works on the level of asset allocation and on the level of asset classes. For example, if your domestic stocks do really well, you may sell a portion to rebalance your domestic allocation and buy international stocks.
You can rebalance your portfolio at any time, but you may want to set regular check-ins, whether quarterly or annually. There may be no need to rebalance if your asset allocation hasn’t really shifted. One general rule to consider is the suggestion that you rebalance your portfolio whenever an asset allocation changes by 5% or more.
One tool that some investors find useful to help them set appropriate allocations is a target date fund. These funds, which were described briefly above, are primarily for retirement, and they are typically geared toward a specific retirement year (such as 2030, 2045, 2050, and so on).
Target funds hold a diverse mix of stocks and fixed-income investments. As the fund’s target date approaches, the mix of stocks and bonds the fund automatically adjusts to a more conservative allocation — aka the fund’s “glide path.”
For example, if you’re 35 and plan to retire at 65, you could purchase shares in a target-date fund with a target date 30 years in the future. While the fund’s stock allocation may be fairly substantial at the outset, as you approach retirement the fund will gradually increase the proportion of fixed-income assets that it holds.
Target-date funds theoretically offer investors a way to set it and forget it. However, they also present some limitations. For one, you don’t have control over the assets in the fund, nor do you control how the fund’s allocation adjusts over time.
Target funds are typically one-size-fits-all, and that doesn’t always work with an individual’s unique retirement goals. For example, someone aggressively trying to save may want to hold more stocks for longer than a particular target date fund offers. Also, as actively managed funds, they often come with fees that can take a bite out of how much you are ultimately able to save.
Test your understanding of what you just read.
While many investors spend time researching complex issues like bond yields and options trading, understanding and executing a successful asset allocation strategy — one that works for you now, and that you can adjust over the long term — can be more challenging than it seems.
Although asset allocation is a fairly simple idea — it’s basically how you divide up different asset classes in your portfolio to help manage risk — it has enormous strategic implications for your investments as a whole. The three main factors that influence your asset allocation (goals, risk tolerance, and time horizon) seem straightforward enough as separate ideas, yet there is an art and a science to combining them into an asset allocation that makes sense for you. Like so many other things, arriving at the right asset allocation is a learning process.
Invest in what matters most to you with SoFi Active Invest. In a self-directed account provided by SoFi Securities, you can trade stocks, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), mutual funds, alternative funds, options, and more — all while paying $0 commission on every trade. Other fees may apply. Whether you want to trade after-hours or manage your portfolio using real-time stock insights and analyst ratings, you can invest your way in SoFi's easy-to-use mobile app.
Opening and funding an Active Invest account gives you the opportunity to get up to $1,000 in the stock of your choice.¹
Asset allocation refers to the percentage of an overall investment portfolio that an investor sets aside for different types of assets or investments, such as stocks, bonds, cash, or alternative investments.
Portfolio diversification is a separate, yet related, concept. Simple diversification can be achieved with the broader asset classes of stocks, bonds, and cash. But within each asset class you could also consider holding many different assets for additional diversification and risk protection.
Your goals and risk appetite might change as the years go by, and as such, your portfolio’s composition could change or be reallocated to reflect that.
INVESTMENTS ARE NOT FDIC INSURED • ARE NOT BANK GUARANTEED • MAY LOSE VALUE
For disclosures on SoFi Invest platforms visit SoFi.com/legal. For a full listing of the fees associated with Sofi Invest please view our fee schedule.
Financial Tips & Strategies: The tips provided on this website are of a general nature and do not take into account your specific objectives, financial situation, and needs. You should always consider their appropriateness given your own circumstances.
SOIN-Q325-008
Table of Contents
Emerging markets or emerging market economies (EMEs) are in the process of achieving the building blocks of developed nations: they’re establishing regulatory bodies, creating infrastructure, fostering political stability, and supporting mature financial markets. But many emerging markets still face challenges that developed market countries have overcome, and that contributes to potential instability.
Developed economies have higher standards of living and per-capita income, strong infrastructure, typically stable political systems, and mature capital markets. The U.S., Europe, U.K, and Japan are among the biggest developed nations. India, China, and Brazil are a few of the larger countries that fall into the emerging markets category. Some emerging market economies, like these three, are also key global players — and investors may benefit by understanding the opportunities as well as the potential risks emerging markets present.
Key Points
• Emerging market economies show rapid growth, rising personal incomes, and increasing GDP, despite lower per-capita income.
• Political and economic instability, infrastructure, and climate challenges are potential factors to consider.
• China and India have robust sectors and growing foreign investment potential.
• Thailand and South Korea offer high growth potential but face potential political instability and other risks.
• Potential returns and portfolio diversification are advantages, but significant volatility and currency risks exist.
In essence, an emerging market refers to an economy that can become a developed, advanced economy soon. And because an emerging market may be a rapidly growing one, it may offer investment potential in certain sectors.
Internationally focused investors tend to see these countries as potential sources of growth because their economies can resemble an established yet still-young startup company. The infrastructure and blueprint for success have been laid out, but things need to evolve before the economy can truly take off and ultimately mature. At the same time, owing to the challenges emerging market economies often face, there are also potential risks when investing in emerging markets.
Investors might bear the brunt of political turmoil, local infrastructure hurdles, a volatile home currency and illiquid capital markets (if certain enterprises are state-run or otherwise privately held, for example).
What constitutes an emerging market economy is somewhat fluid, and the list can vary depending on the source. Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) classifies 24 countries as emerging; Dow Jones also classifies 24 as emerging. There is some overlap between lists, and some countries may be added or removed as their status changes.
India is one of the world’s biggest emerging economies. Increasingly, though, some investors see India as pushing the bounds of its emerging market status.
China is the second-largest economy globally by gross domestic product (GDP). It has a large manufacturing base, plenty of technological innovation, and the largest population of any country in the world.
Yet China still has a few characteristics typical of an emerging market, and with its Communist-led political system, China has embraced many aspects of capitalism in its economy but investors may experience some turbulence related to government laws and policy changes. The Renminbi, China’s official currency, has a history of volatility.
India is another big global economy, and it’s considered among the top 10 richest countries in the world, yet India still has a low per-capita income that is typical of an emerging market and poverty is widespread.
At the same time, India was ranked as being among the more advanced emerging markets, thanks to its robust financial system, growing foreign investment, and strong industrials, especially in telecommunication and technology.
Brazil is a large country, with more than 200 million people, 26 states, and 5,500 municipalities. In 2024, Brazil’s GDP clocked in at more than 3%, and its economy has grown steadily in recent years, despite hiccups caused by the pandemic.
As the largest country in South America, and one that is continuing to see growth, it’s attracted the attention of some investors. In all, it’s one of a handful of emerging markets, though there are still areas rife with poverty, similar to India.
South Africa is the largest economy in Africa, and one of only a handful that has seen a relatively stable macroeconomic environment. It’s a country that has its issues, of course, and some ugly history to contend with — as most countries do. Even so, it’s created a fairly welcoming environment for businesses, and thus, investors.
Mexico is another country that ticks all the boxes to qualify as an emerging market, and is a major trading partner with countries like the U.S. Like the aforementioned countries, though, it still has economic weaknesses, and widespread poverty.
As noted above, there isn’t a single definition of an emerging market, but there are some markers that distinguish these economies from developed nations.
An emerging market economy is often in a state of rapid expansion. There is perhaps no better time to be invested in the growth of a country than when it enters this phase.
At this point, an emerging market has typically laid much of the groundwork necessary for becoming a developed nation. Capital markets and regulatory bodies have been established, personal incomes are rising, innovation is flourishing, and gross domestic product (GDP) is climbing.
The World Bank keeps a record of the gross national income (GNI) of many countries. For the fiscal year of 2025, lower-middle-income economies are defined as having GNI per capita of between $1,146 and $4,515 per year. At the same time, upper-middle-income economies are defined as having GNI per capita between $4,516 and $14,005.
The vast majority of countries that are considered emerging markets fall into the lower-middle and upper-middle-income ranges. For example, India, Pakistan, and the Philippines are lower-middle-income, while China, Brazil, and Mexico are upper-middle-income. Thus, all these countries are referred to as emerging markets despite the considerable differences in their economic progression.
For most EMEs, volatility is par for the course. Risk and volatility tend to go hand in hand, and both are common among emerging market investments.
Emerging economies can be rife with internal conflicts, political turmoil, and economic upheaval. Some of these countries might see revolutions, political coups, or become targets of sanctions by more powerful developed nations.
Any one of these factors can have an immediate impact on financial markets and the performance of various sectors. Investors need to know the lay of the land when considering which EMEs to invest in.
While some EMEs have well-developed infrastructure, many are a mix of sophisticated cities and rural regions that lack technology, services and basic amenities like reliable transportation. This lack of infrastructure can leave emerging markets especially vulnerable to any kind of crisis, whether political or from a natural disaster.
For example, if a country relies on agricultural exports for a significant portion of its trade, a tsunami, hurricane, or earthquake could derail related commerce.
On the other hand, climate challenges may also present investment opportunities that are worth considering.
The value of a country’s currency is an important factor to keep in mind when considering investing in emerging markets.
Sometimes it can look like stock prices are soaring, but that might not be the case if the currency is declining.
If a stock goes up by 50% in a month, but the national currency declines by 90% during the same period, investors could see a net loss, although they might not recognize it as such until converting gains to their own native currency.
Emerging market economies tend to rely heavily on exports. That means their economies depend in large part on selling goods and services to other countries.
A developed nation might house all the needs of production within its own shores while also being home to a population with the income necessary to purchase those goods and services. Developing countries, however, must export the bulk of what they create.
Emerging economies play a significant role in the growth of the global economy, accounting for about 50% of the world’s economic growth. Moreover, it’s estimated that by 2050 three countries could represent the biggest economies: the U.S., China, and India, with only one currently being classified as a developed economy.
But, while emerging markets help fuel global growth, some of those with higher growth opportunities also come with turbulent political situations.
As an investor, the political climate of emerging market investments can pose serious risks. Although there is potential for higher returns, especially in EMEs that are in a growth phase, investors should consider the potential downside. For example, Thailand and South Korea are emerging economies with high growth potential, but there is also a lot of political instability in these regions.
💡 Quick Tip: Are self-directed brokerage accounts cost efficient? They can be, because they offer the convenience of being able to buy stocks online without using a traditional full-service broker (and the typical broker fees).
Let’s recap some of the pros and cons associated with EME investments.
Pros of investing in emerging markets include:
• High-performance potential: Selecting the right investments in EMEs at the right time may result in returns that might be greater than other investments. Rapidly growing economies could provide opportunity for potential returns. But as noted above, it’s impossible to guarantee the timing of any investment.
• Global diversification: Investing in EMEs provides a chance to hold assets that go beyond the borders of an investor’s home country. So even if an unforeseen event should happen that contributes to slower domestic growth, it’s possible that investments elsewhere could perform well and provide some balance.
Cons of investing in emerging markets include:
• High volatility: As a general rule, investments with higher liquidity and market capitalization tend to be less volatile because it takes significant capital inflows or outflows to move their prices.
EMEs tend to have smaller capital markets combined with ongoing challenges, making them vulnerable to volatility.
• High risk: With high volatility and uncertainty comes higher risk. What’s more, that risk can’t always be quantified. A situation might be even more unpredictable than it seems if factors coincide (e.g. a drought plus political instability).
All investments carry risk, but EMEs bring with them a host of fresh variables that can twist and turn in unexpected ways.
• Low accessibility: While liquid capital markets are a characteristic of emerging markets, that liquidity still doesn’t match up to that of developed economies.
It may be necessary to consult with an investment advisor or pursue other means of deploying capital that may be undesirable to some investors.
Emerging markets are generally thought of as high-risk, high-reward investments.
They can provide yet another way to diversify an investment portfolio. Having all of your portfolio invested in the assets of a single country may put you at the mercy of that country’s circumstances. If something goes wrong, like social unrest, a currency crisis, or widespread natural disasters, that might impact your investments.
Being invested in multiple countries may help mitigate the risk of something unexpected happening to any single economy.
The returns from emerging markets could potentially exceed those found elsewhere. If investors can capitalize on the high rate of growth in an emerging market at the right time and avoid any of the potential mishaps, they could stand to profit. Of course timing any market, let alone a more complex and potentially volatile emerging market, may not be a winning strategy.
There are a few ways or strategies that investors can utilize to invest in emerging markets, such as buying funds, or buying stocks directly.
Investors can look at different exchange-traded funds (ETFs) or mutual funds that comprise assets from emerging markets. Funds may have some degree of built-in diversification, too, within those markets (such as holding different types of assets, or stocks of companies from various industries). This may be a simple way to add exposure to a specific or slate of emerging economies to a portfolio.
It’s also possible to buy stocks of companies based in various emerging markets. That could entail buying Chinese or Indian stocks, for example, but it’s possible that you may need to buy them over-the-counter (OTC).
If diversification is a chief concern for mitigating risk, then investors may want to look at starting with some emerging market funds that are already diversified to some degree. There are many options out there, and it may also be worth discussing with a financial professional to see what your options are.
While developed nations like the U.S. and Europe and Japan regularly make headlines as global powerhouses, emerging market countries actually make up a major part of the world’s economy — and possibly, some opportunities for investors. China and India are two of the biggest emerging markets, and not because of their vast populations. They both have maturing financial markets and strong industrial sectors and a great deal of foreign investment. And like other emerging markets, these countries have seen rapid growth in certain sectors (e.g., technology).
Despite their economic stature, though, both countries still face challenges common to many emerging economies, including political turbulence, currency fluctuations and low per-capita income.
It’s factors like these that can contribute to the risks of investing in emerging markets. And yet, emerging markets may also present unique investment opportunities owing to the fact that they are growing rapidly. But investors need to carefully weigh the potential risks.
Invest in what matters most to you with SoFi Active Invest. In a self-directed account provided by SoFi Securities, you can trade stocks, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), mutual funds, alternative funds, options, and more — all while paying $0 commission on every trade. Other fees may apply. Whether you want to trade after-hours or manage your portfolio using real-time stock insights and analyst ratings, you can invest your way in SoFi's easy-to-use mobile app.
Opening and funding an Active Invest account gives you the opportunity to get up to $1,000 in the stock of your choice.¹
Generally, “rapid growth” in reference to an emerging market would take economic growth into account, often measured by GDP. So, if an emerging market is seeing high GDP growth, it may be said to be experiencing rapid growth.
Developed markets are inherently more stable, and investing in those markets may introduce less risk to a portfolio. Emerging markets are generally riskier for a variety of reasons, but could also provide the opportunity to see faster growth, and thus, bigger potential returns. There are no guarantees, however.
It’s possible that industries such as tech, health care, and even renewable energy could thrive in emerging markets, but there are many factors that could stymie their growth, too. Suffice it to say that each market is different, and because an industry thrives in one country doesn’t mean it necessarily would in another.
Investors can buy shares of stocks from companies in emerging markets, or even buy shares of funds with significant holdings in those markets.
INVESTMENTS ARE NOT FDIC INSURED • ARE NOT BANK GUARANTEED • MAY LOSE VALUE
For disclosures on SoFi Invest platforms visit SoFi.com/legal. For a full listing of the fees associated with Sofi Invest please view our fee schedule.
Financial Tips & Strategies: The tips provided on this website are of a general nature and do not take into account your specific objectives, financial situation, and needs. You should always consider their appropriateness given your own circumstances.
Disclaimer: The projections or other information regarding the likelihood of various investment outcomes are hypothetical in nature, do not reflect actual investment results, and are not guarantees of future results.
Mutual Funds (MFs): Investors should carefully consider the information contained in the prospectus, which contains the Fund’s investment objectives, risks, charges, expenses, and other relevant information. You may obtain a prospectus from the Fund company’s website or clicking the prospectus link on the fund's respective page at sofi.com. You may also contact customer service at: 1.855.456.7634. Please read the prospectus carefully prior to investing.Mutual Funds must be bought and sold at NAV (Net Asset Value); unless otherwise noted in the prospectus, trades are only done once per day after the markets close. Investment returns are subject to risk, include the risk of loss. Shares may be worth more or less their original value when redeemed. The diversification of a mutual fund will not protect against loss. A mutual fund may not achieve its stated investment objective. Rebalancing and other activities within the fund may be subject to tax consequences.
Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs): Investors should carefully consider the information contained in the prospectus, which contains the Fund’s investment objectives, risks, charges, expenses, and other relevant information. You may obtain a prospectus from the Fund company’s website or by emailing customer service at [email protected]. Please read the prospectus carefully prior to investing.
Investment Risk: Diversification can help reduce some investment risk. It cannot guarantee profit, or fully protect in a down market.
SOIN-Q325-010
Read moreTable of Contents
A naked (or uncovered) option is an option that is issued and sold without the seller owning the underlying asset or reserving the cash needed to meet the obligation of the option if exercised.
While an options writer (or seller) collects a premium upfront for naked options, they also assume the risk of the option being exercised. If exercised, they’re obligated to deliver the underlying securities at the strike price (in the case of a call option) or purchase the underlying securities at the strike price (in the case of a put).
But because a naked writer doesn’t hold the securities or cash to cover the option they wrote, they need to buy the underlying asset on the open market if the option moves into the money and is assigned, making them naked options. Given the extreme risk of naked options, they should only be used by investors with a very high tolerance for risk.
Key Points
• Naked options involve selling options without owning the underlying asset or reserving cash to cover the trade if the option is exercised.
• Naked options are extremely high risk due to unlimited potential losses if the market moves against the position.
• Naked options sellers must have a margin account and meet specific requirements to trade naked options.
• Naked options strategies include selling calls and puts to try to generate income.
• Using risk management strategies is essential to try to mitigate the significant risk of loss associated with naked options.
When an investor buys an option, they’re buying the right (but not the obligation) to buy or sell a security at a specific price either on or before the option contract’s expiration. An option giving a buyer the right to purchase the underlying asset is known as a “call” option, while an option giving a buyer right to sell the underlying asset is known as a “put” option.
Investors pay a premium to purchase options, while those who sell, or write options, collect the premiums. Some writers hold the stock or the cash equivalent needed to fulfill the contract in case the option is exercised before or on the day it expires. The ones who don’t are sometimes called naked writers, because their options have no cover.
Writing naked options is extremely risky since losses can be substantial and even theoretically infinite in the case of writing naked calls. The maximum gain naked option writers may see, meanwhile, is the premium they receive upfront.
Despite the risks, some writers may consider selling naked options to try to collect the premium when the implied volatility of the underlying asset is low and they believe it’s likely to stay out of the money. In these situations, the goal is often to try to take advantage of stable conditions and reduced assignment risk, even if premiums are smaller, though there is still a high risk of seeing losses.
Some naked writers traders may be willing to risk writing naked options when they believe the anticipated volatility for the underlying asset is higher than it should be. Since volatility drives up options’ prices, they’re betting that they may receive a higher premium while the asset’s market price remains stable. This is an incredibly risky maneuver, however, since they stand to see massive losses if the asset sees bigger price swings and moves into the money.
Recommended: A Guide to Options Trading
Naked options offer writers the potential to profit from premiums received, but they come with a high risk of resulting in substantial losses. Here’s what to consider before using this advanced strategy.
Premium income: Option writers collect premiums upfront, which can generate income if the contract expires worthless.
No capital tied up in the underlying asset: Because the writer doesn’t hold the underlying asset, their available capital may be invested elsewhere.
May appeal in low-volatility markets: While options writers often seek higher premiums during periods of elevated volatility, naked options may be attractive to some when implied volatility is low and premiums are relatively stable. This is because the price of the underlying asset may be less likely to see bigger price movements and move into the money. There is always the possibility, however, that the asset’s price could move against them.
Unlimited loss potential: For naked calls, a rising stock price can create uncapped losses if the writer must buy at market value. Naked puts can also lead to significant losses if the stock price falls sharply, obligating the writer to purchase shares at a strike price that is well above market value.
Margin requirements: Brokerages often require high levels of capital and may issue margin calls if the position moves against the writer.
Limited to experienced investors: Most brokerages restrict this strategy to individuals who meet strict approval criteria due to its complexity and risk.
Recommended: 10 Options Strategies You Should Know
Because naked call writing comes with almost limitless risks, brokerage firms typically require investors to meet strict margin requirements and have enough experience with options trading to do it. Check the brokerage’s options agreement, which typically outlines the requirements for writing options. The high risks of writing naked options are why many brokerages apply higher maintenance margin requirements for option-writing traders.
Generally, to sell a naked call option, for example, an investor would tell their broker to “sell to open” a call position. This means the investor is initiating the short call position. The trade is considered to be “naked” only if they do not own the underlying asset. An investor would do this if they expected the stock to go down, or at least not go any higher than the volatility priced into the option contract price.
If the investor who writes a naked call is right, and the option stays “out of the money” (meaning the security’s price is below a call option’s strike price), then the investor will pocket a premium. But if they’re wrong, the losses can be theoretically unlimited.
This is why some investors, when they expect a stock to decline, may instead choose to purchase a put option and pay the premium. In that case, the worst-case scenario is that they lose the amount of the premium and no more.
Most investors who employ the naked options strategy will also use risk-control strategies given the high risk associated with naked options.
Perhaps the simplest way to hedge the risk of writing the option is to either buy the underlying security, or to buy an offsetting option that would create an option spread, which may help limit potential losses if the trade moves against the writer. This would change the position from being a naked option to a covered option.
Some investors may also use stop-loss orders or set price-based exit points to try to close out a position before assignment, though this requires monitoring and quick execution. These strategies aim to exit the option before it becomes in-the-money and is assigned. Other risk-mitigation strategies can involve derivative instruments and computer models, and may be too time-consuming for most investors.
Another important way that options writers try to manage their risk is by being conservative in setting the strike prices of the options. Consider an investor selling a put option with a $90 strike price when the stock is trading at $100 (for a premium of say $0.50). Setting the strike price further from where the current market is trading may help reduce their risk. That’s because the market would have to move dramatically for those options to be in the money at expiration.
💡 Quick Tip: All investments come with some degree of risk — and some are riskier than others. Before investing online, decide on your investment goals and how much risk you want to take.
With naked options, the investor does not hold a position in the underlying asset. Because this is a risky move, brokerage firms typically restrict it to high-net-worth investors or experienced investors, and they also require a margin account. It’s crucial that investors fully understand the very high risk of seeing substantial losses prior to considering naked options strategies.
SoFi’s options trading platform offers qualified investors the flexibility to pursue income generation, manage risk, and use advanced trading strategies. Investors may buy put and call options or sell covered calls and cash-secured puts to speculate on the price movements of stocks, all through a simple, intuitive interface.
With SoFi Invest® online options trading, there are no contract fees and no commissions. Plus, SoFi offers educational support — including in-app coaching resources, real-time pricing, and other tools to help you make informed decisions, based on your tolerance for risk.
A naked option is a type of options contract where the seller does not hold the underlying asset, nor has sufficient cash reserved to fulfill the contract if exercised. This exposes the seller to potentially unlimited losses. Naked calls and puts are typically permitted only for experienced investors with high risk tolerance and margin approval.
A common example of an uncovered, or naked, option is a call option sold by an investor who doesn’t own the underlying stock. If the stock price rises significantly and the option is exercised, the seller must buy shares at market price to deliver them, which can result in substantial losses.
Naked options are risky because the seller has no protection if the market moves against them. Without owning the underlying asset or an offsetting position, losses can be substantial or even technically unlimited in the case of naked call options if the stock price rises sharply.
No, not all investors can trade naked options. Many brokerages restrict this strategy to high-net-worth individuals or experienced traders who meet strict margin and approval requirements, due to the significant risk involved.
INVESTMENTS ARE NOT FDIC INSURED • ARE NOT BANK GUARANTEED • MAY LOSE VALUE
For disclosures on SoFi Invest platforms visit SoFi.com/legal. For a full listing of the fees associated with Sofi Invest please view our fee schedule.
Options involve risks, including substantial risk of loss and the possibility an investor may lose the entire amount invested in a short period of time. Before an investor begins trading options they should familiarize themselves with the Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options . Tax considerations with options transactions are unique, investors should consult with their tax advisor to understand the impact to their taxes.
Disclaimer: The projections or other information regarding the likelihood of various investment outcomes are hypothetical in nature, do not reflect actual investment results, and are not guarantees of future results.
Financial Tips & Strategies: The tips provided on this website are of a general nature and do not take into account your specific objectives, financial situation, and needs. You should always consider their appropriateness given your own circumstances.
Utilizing a margin loan is generally considered more appropriate for experienced investors as there are additional costs and risks associated. It is possible to lose more than your initial investment when using margin. Please see SoFi.com/wealth/assets/documents/brokerage-margin-disclosure-statement.pdf for detailed disclosure information.
SOIN-Q225-066
Read moreTable of Contents
Leveraged exchange-traded funds (ETFs) are tradable funds that allow investors to make magnified bets on an underlying index. Leveraged ETFs have been popular among investors looking to amplify their exposure to a market with a single trade. But it’s important to know that leveraged ETFs are much more complicated than traditional ETFs, and they’re also higher risk.
Because they’re constructed to deliver multiples of the daily performance of the benchmark they track, investing in leveraged ETFs can lead to massive losses. And for reasons related to their inner mechanics, they’re not good for investors who may be looking for returns when held for an extended time.
Key Points
• Leveraged ETFs allow magnified bets on an underlying index.
• These funds are popular for amplifying market exposure with a single trade.
• Potential for amplified losses exists due to compounding returns.
• The risk of holding leveraged ETFs longer than a day increases risk of potential losses for most investors. The SEC has also warned that these ETFs are designed to meet daily performance objectives, not necessarily long-term investing goals.
• Higher costs and closure risks are notable concerns.
Exchange-traded funds, or ETFs, are securities, and can embody a form of index investing. They’re typically baskets of stocks, bonds, or other assets that aim to mirror the moves of an index, though ETFs can have many different aims or goals. Leveraged ETFs use derivatives so that investors may potentially double (2x), triple (3x) or short (-1) the daily gains or losses of the index. Financial derivatives are contracts whose prices are reliant on an underlying asset.
In finance, leverage is the practice of using borrowed money to increase the potential return on an investment. Leveraged ETFs use derivatives to increase the potential return on an investment.
Let’s look at a hypothetical example. Say an investor buys a regular, non-leveraged ETF. Here’s how such an ETF would work. If it tracks the S&P 500 Index and the benchmark gauge rises 1% on a given day, the non-leveraged ETF would also climb about 1%.
If, however, the investor buys a triple leveraged ETF or 3x ETF, their return for that given trading day could be a 3% gain. The reverse scenario could also happen, though. If the S&P 500 fell 1% on a given day, the owner of the triple leveraged ETF can suffer a 3% loss.
Most of these ETFs are designed to try to outperform a benchmark or index’s daily performance, and holding them longer than a day could result in losses, as such. Accordingly, they’re not intended for long-term investing strategies.
💡 Quick Tip: All investments come with some degree of risk — and some are riskier than others. Before investing online, decide on your investment goals and how much risk you want to take.
There are pros and cons to ETFs themselves. But leveraged ETFs can be particularly problematic for investors due to their design. They are constructed to deliver multiples of an underlying asset’s daily returns, not weekly, monthly or annual returns. Leveraged ETFs don’t deliver the exact magnitude of 2x or 3x if held for longer than a day.
So, if the S&P 500 were to rise 5% in a week, a triple leveraged S&P 500 would not climb 15% in that week. The same would be true for a double leveraged ETF. There’s no guarantee it would return 2x or 10% to its owner.
That’s because of how leveraged ETFs are constructed. In order to maintain their 2x or 3x exposure, leveraged ETFs use derivatives that need to be rebalanced at the end of each day. This process can erode the returns of the ETFs — a process known as “decay” in the market.
Here are some of the types of leveraged ETFs on the market:
• Double Leveraged (2x) ETFs give investors double exposure to the daily return of an index of stocks, bonds, or commodities. So if an asset or market moves 1.5% in a single day, the fund aims to deliver a return of 3% that day.
• Triple Leveraged (3x) ETFs try to provide investors with 3x amplification. So if the underlying asset or index rises or falls 2% on a trading day, the ETF seeks to rise or fall 6%.
• Inverse (-1) ETFs are also considered to be leveraged ETFs. They move in the opposite direction of the underlying asset they’re designed to follow. So if an index moves -1%, the ETF would aim to climb 1%, and vice versa. Inverse ETFs are essentially a form of shorting a stock. Investors are able to short the underlying market by buying shares of an inverse ETF.
Some of the advantages of leveraged ETFs include the following:
Leveraged ETFs have made it easier for investors to make leveraged wagers on the market, which can be a day-trading strategy but not a practice that’s readily available to all investors, particularly retail investors at home who may be trading in smaller increments.
Leveraged ETFs can be useful for a one-day wager that an investor wants to make on an underlying market, such as technology stocks, high-yield bonds, or emerging markets.
Inverse ETFs can give investors the ability to short, or bet against, an asset. Short sales aren’t easily available to non-professional investors, particularly retail investors at home. Shorting can be a way for investors to hedge or offset the risk in their holdings.
Some of the potential disadvantages of leveraged ETFs include the following:
With leveraged ETFs, investors could potentially see outsized losses due to how the products compound returns. For instance, if an index were to tumble 3% in a single day, a holder of leveraged ETFs would experience a plunge of 9% in the shares of their fund.
Inverse ETFs allow investors to short assets, but because of how there’s no limit to how high an asset can go, that means investors could see their holdings in the inverse ETF go to zero.
Leveraged ETFs use derivatives to achieve their amplified returns. Therefore, investors should be aware of the counterparty risk — or the risk from the other parties involved in the derivatives.
Leveraged ETFs tend to be more expensive than traditional ETFs. Investors who want to understand how fund fees work should look at the ETF’s expense ratio. For instance, some popular leveraged ETFs can have an expense ratio of 0.95%. That compares with more traditional ETFs, which can have an expense ratio of around 0.20%.
There’s a high risk of closure. Investors who don’t sell out of their leveraged ETF shares before the delisting date could be left with positions that are difficult or costly to liquidate.
💡 Quick Tip: How to manage potential risk factors in a self directed investment account? Doing your research and employing strategies like dollar-cost averaging and diversification may help mitigate financial risk when trading stocks.
Regulators’ rules on leveraged ETFs have varied in recent years. And they continue to change.
Most recently, in early 2023, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a bulletin about leveraged ETFs, warning investors about the particular risks associated with them.
In October 2020, the SEC made a rule change that would make it easier to launch leveraged ETFs, while capping the amount of leverage at 200%. The move was a break away from prior announcements that sought to slow down the creation of new leveraged ETFs. The SEC had previously allowed existing leveraged ETFs to be continued to be traded, while putting restrictions on the approval of new such funds. The SEC issued an alert about leveraged funds to retail investors in 2009.
In May 2017, the SEC approved the first quadruple (4x) leveraged ETF, only to halt its decision soon after.
Some investment firms and ETF providers have pushed for the term “ETF” to not be applied to leveraged and inverse funds. They argue that the term “ETF” is used for a range of products that can lead to significantly different outcomes for investors.
Leveraged ETFs use derivatives in their construction to try to deliver amplified returns for an investor. Relative to index funds, ETFs can allow entire markets to be more easily traded, similar to how shares of a stock are traded. Leveraged ETFs are not safe for all investors, particularly inexperienced ones.
These ETFs can cause massive losses because of how they may magnify returns and losses. In addition, market observers and regulators have said that leveraged ETFs may be better suited for professional or experienced investors to be used within a single trading session. The use of derivatives in such funds causes their performance to veer from the underlying market if the ETFs are bought and held. As always, it’s important to do your research about any ETF or investment before investing.
Invest in what matters most to you with SoFi Active Invest. In a self-directed account provided by SoFi Securities, you can trade stocks, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), mutual funds, alternative funds, options, and more — all while paying $0 commission on every trade. Other fees may apply. Whether you want to trade after-hours or manage your portfolio using real-time stock insights and analyst ratings, you can invest your way in SoFi's easy-to-use mobile app.
Opening and funding an Active Invest account gives you the opportunity to get up to $1,000 in the stock of your choice.¹
There are several types of leveraged ETFs, including double leveraged (2x) ETFs, which give investors double exposure to the daily return of an index of stocks, bonds, or commodities. There are also triple leveraged (3x) ETFs that try to provide investors with 3x amplification. Inverse (-1) ETFs are also considered to be leveraged ETFs. They move in the opposite direction of the underlying asset they’re designed to follow.
Leveraged ETFs allow for the potential of outsized losses, introduce additional investment and derivative risks, and may have higher associated costs than traditional ETFs.
Leveraged ETFs are not intended for beginning investors, as they’re more complex, and have additional risks. As such, traditional ETFs may be a better option, depending on the specifics of an investor’s situation.
INVESTMENTS ARE NOT FDIC INSURED • ARE NOT BANK GUARANTEED • MAY LOSE VALUE
For disclosures on SoFi Invest platforms visit SoFi.com/legal. For a full listing of the fees associated with Sofi Invest please view our fee schedule.
Financial Tips & Strategies: The tips provided on this website are of a general nature and do not take into account your specific objectives, financial situation, and needs. You should always consider their appropriateness given your own circumstances.
SOIN-Q225-145
Read moreSee what SoFi can do for you and your finances.
Select a product below and get your rate in just minutes.